Hello fellas,

My current company is shifting its home-made ERP (yeah, the one that looks like missing puzzle, and bug ridden, plus obsolete technologies ) to Infor ERP.

The reason we chose Infor is because of its competitive price. However, the management prefer to chose Baan V over Ln 6.

As a developer, I think it would be smarter to choose Ln 6 in many views. From the product support, I think Ln 6 will last longer in the market than Baan V (obviously,lol) and the technology is much better since by default, newer applications performs better in current hardware.

For rebutting the insane idea, I did some research on both products details in the internet. I can get overall picture of Ln 6 from many website, but unfortunately Baan V, none. So the comparison is not going very well.

Oh, the guy that made the decision is not coming from IT industry. Maybe thats why. But that aside, could any of you give me details on Baan V, regarding its technology, modules and performance? Also, is Ln 6 installation much harder and complex than Baan V? Also, if any of you have experience in both products, could you elaborate more?

Thanks alot. This forum is the only lifeline I have for this project. I do not want this company to make wrong decision as we know, implementing wrong ERP is simply a major pain in the a$$.

Blaze.

bump for justice and desperation. Any info/opinion/criticism is greatly welcomed by me!

Blaze,

I am more Technical than functional person. Here are a couple of threads on the forum for reference -

Improvements in LN visa vis Baan 5c

technical advantage LN compared to Baaniv or BaanV?

Question Differences between Baan IV, V and iBaan.

__________________
The art of perfection does not lie in doing extraordinary things but, doing ordinary things extraordinarily well. [-N. Prashanth Rao]
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way,BaaNBoard,NPRao

Hi,

First of all: welcome to baanboard.

I can't tell much about the functionality, I working on the technical side of Infor. I have managed baanV for a about 8 years, last 3 years working with mostly ERPLN.

Regarding performance: both products use the same portingset so the statements that the driver generates if the application performs the same sql should be the same.
If you are able to handle/manage baanV you can handle ERPLN as well. The 'tools' part in ERPLN is a of course updated but still uses the same technology. (E.g. in ERPLN reports only need to be compiled in english because labels are taken out, in BaanV you need to compile reports in all languages in which you need them.)

ERPLN has some more nice features (like defining your own custom database fields) which makes it better. Also with ERPLN the concept of feature packs are introduced so new functionality is added on a yearly base. With Baan5c there is not much new development apart of the bug fixing. Some things are back ported (like the WebUI), but not all.
Think also about reporting: with ERPLN FP7 it will be possible to beautify reports with MS reporting, in BaanV you have to use third party products.

I wouldn't recommend new customer to install this kind of applications themselves, rather hire a experienced consultant to do it. Normally they need about 3 days to do it.

In my opinion ERPLN would be a better choice.

Regards,
Han

Thanks for awesome replies.

I see. Because the management main reason of not getting LN but Baan V instead is because the implementation team is not familiar with LN. So, from your input, if the implementation team is capable of Baan V, they should be able to do LN 6 without any problem right?

From the hardware view, is Baan V capable of running on modern servers? Which one is more hardware-friendly and efficient ?

Also, can you please describe platforms that both Baan V and LN6 capable running on, as well as databases?

Thanks,
Blaze.

NPRao, the link that you gave me is very useful as my company is an automotive company. But the thread is old, the replies are on 2000-2004. Since that, has LN6 evolved to cater automotive industry?

Also, I forget to ask this..what type of programming language used in LN6 and Baan V?

Application is partly quite different between BaanV/ERPLN so I don't think that will be an easy task for your implementation team. I was only referring to the 'tools' part (application administration).

Right now they use the same portingset so both can run on same platforms. However ERPLN is consuming more memory.

Platforms: some unix (hp-ux/solaris/aix), linux (SLES and Redhat ES/AS), windows. RDBMS: ms-sql, oracle, db2, informix (not all on all platforms). Exact details are mentioned in the portingset release notes.

The programming language is a own kind of basic language. It's 4GL (partly event driven). To know the events is the most difficult part rest should not be a problem if you know how to write an if/then/else and while statement.

You can get some more information on the Infor site - http://www.infor.com/solutions/erp/

On the left panel on the forum page you can click the 2 links for more information on System Architecture and features of the Programming language.
* BaanERP Tutorial
* Programmer's Manual

__________________
The art of perfection does not lie in doing extraordinary things but, doing ordinary things extraordinarily well. [-N. Prashanth Rao]
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way,BaaNBoard,NPRao

I got this press release from the linkedin site -

Infor ERP LN Helps Stork Power Services Unite its IT-solutions

__________________
The art of perfection does not lie in doing extraordinary things but, doing ordinary things extraordinarily well. [-N. Prashanth Rao]
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way,BaaNBoard,NPRao

Thanks alot Han and NPRao. Without your explanations, I would be still crawling in the dark.

In general, here is the list of modules involved our company operations:

- Product Lifecycle Management
- Production Planning
- Manufacturing
- CBU Sales
- Spare Parts
- Service
- Plant Maintenance
- Quality Control
- Finance
- Purchasing

I know that you (Han & NPRao) are from technical site, but if we were to implement Baan V or LN 6, what is the best implementation methodology? What is the sequence of the implementation (in terms of module) ?

Thanks,
Blaze

Hi Blazingknife,

If your implementation team is only familiar with BAAN V then get a new implementation team!
I cannot believe that in this day and age a company will choose its most important business tool based on the lack of knowledge of consultants.
BAAN V is out dated technology this has been there since 1998.

Unlike NPRao and Han, I am only focussed on the functional side and have done numerous BAAN V and two ERP LN implementations. My recommendations is ERP LN because it is so much better and has many new features in all the areas that are important for your company:

- Product Lifecycle Management
- Production Planning
- Manufacturing
- CBU Sales
- Spare Parts
- Service
- Plant Maintenance
- Quality Control
- Finance
- Purchasing

For example Spare Parts, Service and Plant Maintenance. These three areas are covered by LN Service and this is so much better than BAAN V Service. Spare parts sales are not covered in BAAN V and can only be done by sales orders. In LN Service you can actually do specific spare parts sales that are related to your service business.

I will not make a recommendation of what methodology to use and what is the best sequence of implementing these modules because everybody has different views and approaches. But, if you look at it from a high level, these are all the same.

Just get a good advisor who knows both BAAN V and ERP LN and who can tell your management why your company should implement ERP LN.
Good luck and keep us informed of the progress!

__________________
Regards,

Edwin
Moderator BaanBoard
E-Mail: edwin@baanboard.com

Hello blazingknife,
are your company is automotive supplier or assembly? I am have experiance in implementation of ERP LN for car assembly plant, and I can talk you, that ERP LN Assembly Functionality is very good solution for this type of Industry.

Hi Edwin,

Yes, that is what I am trying to explain to them but apparently in this conglomerate, they put the decision on the wrong guy. That is why I am here, to collect as many information as I can and present to them to rebut the idea of implementing Baan V because they dont have expertise in Infor Ln.

Therefore, I welcome any idea/suggestion that you guys throw.

Also, you mentioned that they are all the same on the high level of view? Can you please explain that in details?

------------------

For Vkpacc,

My company supply, manufacture and assembly. But we are more on manufacturing. Most of the parts are supplied by vendors but we do produce some part and supply them as well.

Do you have good suggestion on the implementation methods vkpacc? Any information will be highly appreciated.

As usual, thanks for helping this poor little fella, lol.

blazingknife,
we used INFOR SIM methodology and DEM with referent models. Like result we implemented ERP LN for new car assembly plant in 12 months.
About Baan5 and LN. If your consultancy known Baan5, they can learning ERP LN in shortest time, if we talk about base functionality. But in ERP LN you can use some very important functionality for Automotive - Assembly Control and Purchase/Supply Schedules. For this functions you need more trainings, or consultancy with success experience.

Vkpacc,
Wow 12 months is a very short time. Is there somewhere that I can get the reference of this Infor SIM and DEM methods?